DeepSynapsCLINICAL INTELLIGENCE OS
Evidence map · SCS · painful diabetic neuropathy

SCS for painful diabetic neuropathy: what the research shows

10-kHz spinal cord stimulation for painful diabetic neuropathy. 291 papers from 1989 to 2026, including 10 meta-analyses, 21 systematic reviews and 29 randomised controlled trials. Each study below links to its source.

291Papers in the corpus
10Meta-analyses
29Randomised controlled trials
74Open-access papers

Study design

Jev labels
Meta-analysis10Systematic review21RCT29Non-randomised trial7Cohort8Cross-sectional1Case series3Case report14

59 papers have no confident study-design label yet. Labels are AI-classified by Jev: advisory, not clinician-reviewed.

Papers over time

by publication year
15678 1985–892005–092025–26*

* 2025–26 is still in progress, so its count is incomplete.

Most-cited trials and reviews

by citations
  1. 1

    Spinal cord stimulation in patients with painful diabetic neuropathy: a multicentre randomized clinical trial.

    RCTde Vos et al. · 2014 · Pain · 282 citations
  2. 2

    Effect of High-frequency (10-kHz) Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients With Painful Diabetic Neuropathy: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

    RCTPetersen et al. · 2021 · JAMA neurology · 243 citations · Open access
  3. 3

    Electrical spinal-cord stimulation for painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy.

    RCTTesfaye et al. · 1996 · Lancet (London, England) · 169 citations
  4. 4

    Spinal cord stimulation and pain relief in painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy: a prospective two-center randomized controlled trial.

    RCTSlangen et al. · 2014 · Diabetes care · 165 citations
  5. 5

    Sustained Treatment Effect of Spinal Cord Stimulation in Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: 24-Month Follow-up of a Prospective Two-Center Randomized Controlled Trial.

    RCTvan Beek et al. · 2015 · Diabetes care · 65 citations
  6. 6

    Long-term efficacy of high-frequency (10 kHz) spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of painful diabetic neuropathy: 24-Month results of a randomized controlled trial.

    RCTPetersen et al. · 2023 · Diabetes research and clinical practice · 44 citations · Open access
  7. 7

    Evidence-Based Treatment of Painful Diabetic Neuropathy: a Systematic Review.

    Systematic reviewD'Souza et al. · 2022 · Current pain and headache reports · 44 citations
  8. 8

    Quality of life increases in patients with painful diabetic neuropathy following treatment with spinal cord stimulation.

    RCTDuarte et al. · 2016 · Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 44 citations · Open access

Recent trials and reviews

last 3 years
  1. 1

    High-Frequency 10-kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation Provides Long-term (24-Month) Improvements in Diabetes-Related Pain and Quality of Life for Patients with Painful Diabetic Neuropathy.

    RCTPetersen et al. · 2026 · Journal of diabetes science and technology · 7 citations · Open access
  2. 2

    Therapeutic and Diagnostic Landscape of Diabetic Neuropathy: A Systematic Review of Clinical Studies.

    Systematic reviewRajput et al. · 2026 · Cureus · 1 citations · Open access
  3. 3

    Spinal Cord Stimulation Improves Pain and Quality of Life in Painful Diabetic Neuropathy: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.

    Meta-analysisAwad et al. · 2026 · Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society · 0 citations
  4. 4

    Improvement in Protective Sensation: Clinical Evidence From a Randomized Controlled Trial for Treatment of Painful Diabetic Neuropathy With 10 kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation.

    RCTArgoff et al. · 2025 · Journal of diabetes science and technology · 11 citations · Open access
  5. 5

    Assessing the Efficacy of Spinal Cord Stimulation in Managing Painful Diabetic Neuropathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

    Meta-analysisAbbas et al. · 2025 · Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society · 7 citations

Decision support only. This page summarises published literature; it is not medical advice or a recommendation for any patient. Study designs and topic labels are AI-classified by Jev: advisory, not clinician-reviewed. Abstracts are not reproduced here: follow the links to read each source. Data snapshot 2026-09-25.